If you had a time machine, would you go back in time to kill Hitler? I've been thinking about this age old question recently and have come to some interesting conclusions.
At first glance the answer seems perhaps quite obvious to many of us. After all,
killing Hitler would perhaps have prevented the
11-14 million some people from being murdered in the holocaust & would have perhaps prevented a good majority of the
70 million some deaths of World War II. So, it would seem that
to trade one life for the lives of millions is easy enough math for any of us to do. The fact that it's still murder by the mind(s) that pass the judgement, the mouth(s) that agree to give the order, the hand(s) that deal the punishment and the heart(s) of those who raise their fists to the sky to rejoice that justice has been done, shouldn't deter us right?
In Western culture it seems that many of us would most likely concur that the act be done. After all, we've been breast fed by
Western religion and
Judeo-Christian values for hundreds, if not more than two thousand, years; ethics which have brought us such visionary concepts as:
"an eye for an eye" must be taken,
capital punishment must be upheld,
penance must be made to
atone for one's sins. Toss him to the lions that he might be judged by God for all eternity! (Our brand of)"Justice" MUST be done.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b9ea/8b9eafab349ddfc7be772e1f8ca5b06bc599f6f6" alt=""
Conversely,
many Eastern philosophies and religions, however, might venture to say quite the opposite. That
life is a personal journey of one's own consciousness. That one faces the
ultimate judgement for their transgressions in life and beyond from
one's own self. That the
karmic consequences for our actions and our own revelatory realizations of which...and of our
connection to all things in the universe...and of
the degree to which we loved those things, might be more severe for the soul of the individual than any punishment that could ever be delivered by man.
Western thinking, on the other hand,
seems to teach us to
strive for one's own, to
right the wrongs of others, to
intervene in the destinies of those around us in accordance with our own notions of
what should be and
how this life should be lived.
What if it's not our place however, to make such decisions? Did not even Jesus say,
"Let him who has not sin cast the first stone"? Was he not saying that
no one among us has the right to pass judgement on another? That it is neither our responsibility or our right to punish the wrongful acts of our fellow men and women? If God created man in his own image and we are all children of God, isn't ending the life of another not much different than ending our own?
It is not my intent to discuss religion here exactly, rather more to present the idea that
religion has shaped the beliefs and ideals of the entire world since the dawn of time. It's true that
there have been many great teachers and enlightened individuals in the past who have taught us a message love, of peace and unity with all mankind, but
religion itself has caused great destruction in the world despite those teachings. It has created a great chasm between the hearts of men that has led us into thousands of wars and to millions upon millions of deaths throughout history. It has brought division to a world that has not yet the eyes to see that
the Earth and everything on it is in fact one and the same thing. The earth is a celestial body and every organism on it is a part of that body. We and the Earth are one.
So perhaps, personally,
if I were to travel in time, I think I would not use that opportunity to exact vengeance on those who have wronged us in the past, but rather,
I would head to the future with a sense of wonder and curiosity and I would seek out true wisdom from the universe with a heart filled with love.